Legal Opinion

Drouillard v. Jensen Construction Co. of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 11, 1979No. 51302PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Justice:

We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals, Division 1, for the reason that it “has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings . as to call for the exercise of this court’s power of supervision.” 12 O.S.1978 Supp. Ch. 15, App. 3, Rule 3.13 A(4).

Plaintiff, as a sub-contractor, supplied dirt for a certain construction project. He brought suit against the prime contractors and their surety company to recover payment. Plaintiff failed to provide written notice of the claim within 90 days as required by 61 O.S.1971 § 2. He contended the prime…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reed v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. City of New Cordell v. LoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Tyler v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Benke v. SteppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka Railway Co. v. NickelsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Napier v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Myers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. Hebble v. Shell Western E & P, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
  4. Drouillard v. JENSEN CONST. CO. OF OKLAHOMASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Alliance Steel, Inc. v. Martin Yack Construction Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API