Legal Opinion

City of New Cordell v. Lowe

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 19, 1963No. 40216PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Chief Justice.

A sewer line, referred to hereinafter as the “branch line” funneled sewage from the residence of the defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, into one of the sewer mains, or main lines, of plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant. On March 8, 1961, this main became clogged, and raw sewage backed up through the branch line into the residence, inundating its floors with about 4 inches of watery, foul-smelling refuse.

Thereafter, on the same day, employees of the defendant city assisted plaintiffs in draining off, and attempting to wash…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ford Butane Eq. Co. v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Myers v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Rojas v. VuocoloTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Pratt v. WomackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Christensen v. StuchlikIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Kelly v. CB&I CONSTRUCTORS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. French v. Ralph E. Moore, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Pollard v. Land West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Million v. RahhalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API