Legal Opinion

Napier v. Jacobs

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1987No. 77772, (Calendar No. 23)PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

In the instant case, the Court of Appeals found insufficient evidence to support the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. It therefore ordered judgment in favor of the city, notwithstanding the defendant’s failure to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence at trial with motions for a directed verdict, for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial. We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals because defendant failed in this civil case to preserve the issue of the sufficiency of the evidence by proper motions at trial, and no extraordinary circumstance creating a…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Adderley v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Thompson v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Walters v. NadellMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Barnard Manufacturing Co. v. Gates Performance Engineering, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API