Legal Opinion

Reed v. Scott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 20, 1915No. 4992PublishedCited by 59 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge. Action by Mary Scott against R. E. Reed for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MATHEWS, C.

Action by Mary Scott against R. E. Reed. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

This is an action to recover damages for a personal injury, alleged to have been occasioned by the employees of defendant, who were working on the front of a certain building in the city of Muskogee, dropping a piece of iron, which struck plaintiff on the hand, causing certain injuries, for which she seeks to recover damages. Defendant answered by general denial. The parties hereto will be designated as in the court below.

The only assignment of error presented by the defendant is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Wakely v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Fassett v. BoswellOregon Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Dodson Williams v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Norman v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Lowe v. HickorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API