Duncan v. Duncan
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a motion for new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Plaintiff brought this action in the ordinary form of an action in claim and delivery to recover of defendant the possession of certain goods and chattels, or the value thereof, if possession could not be had, and damages for the detention thereof. The goods are alleged in the complaint to be of the value of $1,000 and are set forth in detail. They consist of household furniture, furnishings and fittings of a dwelling-house, the enumeration of which occupies about fourteen folios of closely printed matter in the transcript. The answer consists of a denial of the material allegations of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Lamb v. HarbaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Wetherly v. StrausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Burris v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Christiana v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Thomas v. FursmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Scott v. AustinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Matthews v. HamburgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.