Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Hamburger

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1939No. Civ. 12249PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Defendants have appealed from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor for the value of certain household furniture which was wrongfully sold by defendants.

Plaintiff and her husband, Edward B. Matthews, on May 5, 1938, decided to store their furniture and take a trip to San Francisco to visit friends and relatives. They placed their household furniture and furnishings, which was community property, in storage with Birch-Smith Storage Company in Los Angeles and thereafter drove in the family automobile to Huntington Park to visit friends briefly before leaving on their trip to San Francisco. On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trimble v. TrimbleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Britton v. HammellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Ballinger v. BallingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Duncan v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of McNuttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Fields v. MichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Lynn v. HermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Matthews v. HamburgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API