Legal Opinion

Perkins County v. Nelson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1928No. File No. 6177PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISER, C.

The county of Perkins brought this- action against its treasurer and the state 'bonding department. Defendants separately demurred to- the complaint. The demurrers were sustained. Separate appeals were taken ¡by plaintiff county from the orders sustaining the demurrers. In this opinion is considered only the demurrer of the state bonding department that the complaint did not'state a cause of action.

In Edgerton School District v. Volz, 50 S. D. 107, 208 N. W. 576, this court stated that, prior to the enactment of chapter 335, Laws 1921, “except as otherwise provided by statute,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gress v. EvansSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1877
  2. Edgerton Independent Consolidated School District No. 2 v. VolzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  3. De Rockbraine School District No. 1 of Corson County v. Northern Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State v. SchamberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Roberts County v. WickardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Board of Education of the Independent School District v. WhismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Perkins County v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Summit Ind. Sch. Dist. v. LienSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Beadle County v. LloydSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API