Legal Opinion
People v. Foley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 15, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not err in admitting in evidence the electrical cord, the nylon stocking and the pillow (see, People v Julian, 41 NY2d 340, 342; People v Connelly, 35 NY2d 171, 174). In any event, in light of the overwhelming proof of defendant’s guilt, the admission of that evidence is harmless (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 242). Defendant was not denied due process of law by the delay in the assignment of appellate counsel to prosecute the appeal because he failed to demonstrate prejudice as a result of that delay (see, People v Cousart,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. FarrarNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. ConnellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. CousartNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. BeyorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. MaddoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. AguilarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. NelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999