Legal Opinion

Burns v. Van Buskirk

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 1925No. 24,088PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, O.

Appellants demurred to the complaint in this action on the grounds: (1) That the court had no jurisdiction of the subject of the action; (2) that several causes of action were improperly united; and (3) that the facts stated do not constitute a cause of action. The court overruled the demurrer, gave the statutory certificate of doubt, and this appeal followed.

Respondent brought the action as a taxpayer of the city of Eveleth to recover in its behalf $29,780.30, paid to Saari Brothers for 342,000 feet of lumber purchased by the mayor without obtaining bids, as required by the city…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mayberry v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Fortmeyer v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Pleins v. WachenheimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Burns v. EsslingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Doyle v. St. Paul Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. . LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Struble v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Tritchler v. BergesonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. County of Pennington v. GimmestadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API