Burns v. Van Buskirk
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, O.
Appellants demurred to the complaint in this action on the grounds: (1) That the court had no jurisdiction of the subject of the action; (2) that several causes of action were improperly united; and (3) that the facts stated do not constitute a cause of action. The court overruled the demurrer, gave the statutory certificate of doubt, and this appeal followed.
Respondent brought the action as a taxpayer of the city of Eveleth to recover in its behalf $29,780.30, paid to Saari Brothers for 342,000 feet of lumber purchased by the mayor without obtaining bids, as required by the city…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mayberry v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Fortmeyer v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Pleins v. WachenheimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Burns v. EsslingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Doyle v. St. Paul Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moore v. . LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Struble v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Tritchler v. BergesonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- County of Pennington v. GimmestadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927