Legal Opinion

County of Pennington v. Gimmestad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 4, 1927No. 25,881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lobes, C.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, interposed on the ground that the facts pleaded do not con stitute a cause of action, and on the further ground that the alleged causes of action set forth are improperly united.

The action was brought to recover the balance due Pennington county from the Goodridge State Bank, which had been designated as a depository of county funds and had given bond as required by G. S. 1923, § 848. There were three bonds, executed and approved respectively in February, 1924, October, 1924, and November, 1925. A copy of each…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. BecklundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Burns v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Connellsville By-Product Coal Co. v. Continental Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API