Pleins v. Wachenheimer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $5,000 damages for breach of contract and that the' agreement be rescinded and canceled. The defendant Frank T. Locke demurred to the amended complaint and from an order, Kelly, J., sustaining the demurrer, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Defendant Locke interposed a demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint, specifying as grounds thereof (1) that several causes of action were improperly united, and (2) that the facts therein stated do not constitute a cause of action; and plaintiff appealed from an order sustaining the same.
*343The action is to recover damages for the breach of a contract alleged to have been entered into between plaintiff and defendant Locke, which for the convenience and at the instance of Locke was made in the name of defendant Wachenheimer, who the complaint alleges was the agent of Locke. The complaint…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mayberry v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Rowell v. OlesonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Pease v. PeaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
- Wm. Lindeke Land Co. v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Hanscom v. HerrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
3Cited by20 opinions
- Love v. Brown Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
- First State Bank v. C. E. Stevens Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Venner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Carolina Metal Products Corporation v. Robert Larson and Flame Foil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Price v. Minnesota, Dakota & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.