Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Ousler

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 1894No. 782PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Prom the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

The appellee sued to recover the value of a horse, which had escaped from, his field, without his fault, and was hilled by appellant’s negligence at the crossing of a highway and the railroad. There was a special verdict, upon which judgment was rendered in favor of appellee, appellant’s motion for judgment being overruled with an exception.

Appellant contends, with great vigor, that the animal, on its track at the crossing unattended, was a trespasser, and that for that reason no duty was owing to it from the company, save not to willfully injure it. Our cases adjudicate this question against…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. HensilIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. WalbornIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GainesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. FertigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ShawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. McBride v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API