Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Shaw
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom the Miami Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.
The appellees brought this action against the appellant to recover the value of three horses, killed upon the appellant’s railway track by its train of cars.
The facts necessary for the • determination of the material questions involved in this appeal, as the same appear in the special verdict, may be stated as follows: On the 22d day of July, 1892, the appellant owned and operated a railroad extending through the town of Converse, in Miami county; the general *174course of the main track of said road being eastwardly and westwardly through the town. The track of the road on west side of the town…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. HensilIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. NashIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. FennIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co v. StuartIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. CraycraftIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. TerrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Vandalia Railway Co. v. DulingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. GrayerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Chicago & Erie Railroad v. LeiterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915