McBride v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentJustice Cothran
(concurring and dissenting)'-: I concur in the result of Mr. Justice Stabler’s opinion in so far as it reverses the judgment in this case and remands it to the Circuit Court for a new trial upon the ground stated; but I dissent from his conclusion sustaining the following charge of the Circuit Judge.
“Where the statutory signals are not given and an injury occurs, there is a presumption that the failure to give the signals is (was?) the proximate cause of the injury.”
■ I think that the conclusion reverses the fundamental principle that a plaintiff suing for damages for a tort must not only…
2Cases cited128 opinions
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hayes v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Prest-O-Lite Co. v. SkeelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Rwy. Co. v. GravittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.