Legal Opinion

State v. Coleman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1988No. 87-192PublishedCited by 246 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

Coleman appeals his aggravated murder- convictions and death sentence. We reject his appeal and affirm.

I

Appellant’s first contention is that the guilt-phase jury instructions on complicity are flawed because they do not comport with R.C. 2903.01(D).1 *289According to appellant, where a defendant is charged with aggravated murder in a capital case, jury instructions regarding complicity must specifically state that the inference that defendant intended to kill by aiding a crime is nonconclusive. Because this precise language was not part of the jury instructions, appellant argues the jury’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by246 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. JamisonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Douglas Coley v. Margaret BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API