State v. Coleman
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
Coleman appeals his aggravated murder- convictions and death sentence. We reject his appeal and affirm.
I
Appellant’s first contention is that the guilt-phase jury instructions on complicity are flawed because they do not comport with R.C. 2903.01(D).1 *289According to appellant, where a defendant is charged with aggravated murder in a capital case, jury instructions regarding complicity must specifically state that the inference that defendant intended to kill by aiding a crime is nonconclusive. Because this precise language was not part of the jury instructions, appellant argues the jury’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. ApanovitchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by246 opinions
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. JamisonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Douglas Coley v. Margaret BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.