Legal Opinion

State v. McCoy

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 9, 2003No. C4-02-1788PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This appeal from a misdemeanor domestic-violence conviction presents the question of whether Minn.Stat. § 634.20 (2002) as applied to abrogate the clear-and-convincing-evidence requirement of Minn. R. Evid. 404(b) violates the separation-of-powers doctrine of the Minnesota Constitution. We conclude that the legislature did not intend to abrogate the clear-and-convincing-evidence requirement and that section 634.20 does not conflict with rule 404(b). Because the district court admitted evidence of similar prior conduct without determining whether that conduct was proved…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Burkstrand v. BurkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. CrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. McCoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State v. AliCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API