State v. Ali
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant challenges his conviction of speeding, arguing that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction and the district court erroneously admitted the results of a laser-based speed-measuring device. Because we conclude that the laser evidence was properly admitted, and that the laser reading and the officer’s observations are sufficient to support appellant’s conviction, we affirm.
FACTS
On March 2, 2003, Officer Jerry Johnson of the Minneapolis Police Department was on duty near the intersection of Hennepin and Wilder in Minneapolis. The posted speed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. AltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. MacHholzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. AssayeHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. Fitzwater.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. StoaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. EstesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- Robert David Stoneburner v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.