Legal Opinion

State v. Hanson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1996No. C1-95-531, C5-95-564PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

This consolidated appeal raises the issue of whether Minnesota’s statutory scheme of civil driver’s license revocation followed by criminal prosecution for driving under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances is unconstitutional under the Double Jeopardy Clauses of the United States and Minnesota Constitutions. In these two cases, appellants had their driver’s licenses revoked for 90 days under Minnesota’s implied consent statute, Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1994) (“implied consent statute”), and subsequently faced criminal charges for violating Minnesota’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency, Charles Arlt James Wren Payback Mines, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Tharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. HumesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API