Legal Opinion

Adrian v. Vonk

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 2011No. 25922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Plaintiff ranchers sued the State because of ongoing damage to their property from incursions of prairie dogs from public lands. Relying on multiple statutes requiring the State to manage and control prairie dog populations, plaintiffs requested injunctive relief, abatement, and damages. After considering cross-motions for summary judgment, the circuit court granted plaintiffs summary judgment and ordered a trial on damages. When the case was reassigned, the State moved the new judge to reexamine the first judge’s ruling. On reconsideration, the court vacated the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hansen v. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Lick v. DahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bickner v. RAYMOND TP.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Pourier v. SD DEPT. OF REVENUE & REGULATIONSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hass v. WentzlaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Highmark Federal Credit Union v. HunterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Jorgensen Farms, Inc. v. Country Pride Cooperative, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Parris v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Estate of Sanborn v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API