Legal Opinion
Highmark Federal Credit Union v. Hunter
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 2012No. 26119PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Rachelle Hunter received a loan from Highmark Federal Credit Union to purchase a home and property. A flood damaged the home a few years later. There was no flood insurance. Hunter argues Highmark was negligent in failing to warn her to purchase flood insurance and in failing to purchase the insurance at her expense. Hunter appeals from the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] In 2005, Highmark made a loan to Hunter to purchase a manufactured home and lot in Hermosa, South Dakota. Hunter signed a document titled “Standard Flood Hazard…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Audler v. CBC Innovis Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Glen Kermit Till and Bettie F. Till v. Unifirst Federal Savings and Loan Association and Wortman & Mann, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Albers v. OttenbacherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hamilton v. SommersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Henry A. Bagelmann, Jr. And Mary Jo Bagelmann v. First National Bank and Iowa Bankers Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Bernie v. Catholic Diocese of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Hewitt v. FeldermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Oxton v. RudlandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.