Legal Opinion

Lick v. Dahl

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1979No. 12550, 12570PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

PARTIES

Plaintiffs-appellants John and Doris Lick, on behalf of themselves and other real property owners and taxpayers similarly situated in the County of Roberts, State of South Dakota, brought suit against the County of Roberts and Irene Dahl, County Treasurer, defendants-respondents. For convenience and clarity, the Licks will be referred to as plaintiffs; that class of taxpayers which plaintiffs seek to represent will be referred to as unnamed plaintiffs; and the County of Roberts and Irene Dahl will be referred to as defendants.

ACTION

Plaintiffs seek recovery in a class…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lilian v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Darnall v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Charles v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  5. Henderson v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. South Dakota Board of Regents v. HeegeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re South Dakota Microsoft Antitrust LitigationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Weger v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Public Entity Pool for Liability v. ScoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API