Legal Opinion

Parris v. City of Rapid City

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2013No. 26372PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Property owner, Tracy Parris (Parris), sought to expand the buildings on his property. To do so, Parris asked the City of Rapid City (the City) to rezone a portion of his property zoned within the Flood Hazard Zoning District. The request was denied. The City also denied Parris’ building permits, in part, because the proposed expansion extended to a portion of his property zoned within the Flood Hazard Zoning District. Parris unsuccessfully appealed the City’s denial of his permits to the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Parris then filed a complaint with the circuit…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Save Centennial Valley Ass'n, Inc. v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Esling v. KrambeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Hass v. WentzlaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Saathoff v. KuhlmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hanson v. Minnehaha County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. City of Rapid City v. SchaubSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API