Legal Opinion

Lange v. Olson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

By sec. 2878, Stats., it is provided that a judge before whom an issue is tried may in his discretion set aside the verdict and grant a new trial because the verdict is contrary to the evidence and for other enumerated reasons. From an early day it has been held that orders granted by a trial judge in the exercise of the discretion conferred upon him will not be reversed by this court, even *660if it is of the opinion that the circuit judge has erred, unless there has been a clear or gross abuse of discretion. Van Valkenburgh v. Hoskins, 7 Wis. 496.

There is an exception to this rule. Where a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Beyer v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Vilas v. MasonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. John v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. McLimans v. City of LancasterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Schlag v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jolitz v. FintchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Schmidt v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Crombie v. PowersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Miller v. ZahariasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  5. Goelz v. KnoblauchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API