Legal Opinion
Schlag v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1913PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Sauk county: E. Rat Stevens, Circuit Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBabNes, J.
This is an appeal from an order setting aside a verdict in favor of the defendant and granting a new trial. The circuit judge filed an opinion in which he gave the following reasons for setting the verdict aside:
“The record presents the unusual situation of witnesses directly contradicting their own sworn testimony taken but a short time before the trial with reference to matters which were equally within their knowledge at both times when they were on oath. The record shows no satisfactory explanation of their complete and deliberate contradiction of themselves:
“The plaintiff had a right to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Menominee River Sash & Door Co. v. Milwaukee & Northern RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- R. Connor Co. v. GoodwillieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Lessig v. LessigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Herring v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Pierson v. Citizens' Telephone & Telegraph Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Anderson v. EggertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Hillstead v. ShawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Keeley v. Great Northern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Van Gheem v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Fouse v. PersonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.