Legal Opinion

McLimans v. City of Lancaster

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1883PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Green County. The opinion sufficiently states the case. The plaintiff appealed from an order setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries to the plaintiff by reason of the insufficiency and want of repair of a sidewalk in said city. The cause was fully tried and the evidence very voluminous, and the plaintiff recovered a verdict of $2,000. The defendant made a motion to set aside the verdict, and impliedly to grant a new trial in the cause, on the minutes, on the grounds that the court erred in giving certain instructions to the jury, in rejecting certain instructions asked by the defendant, and because the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duffy v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Lewellen v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Goodnough v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Clithero v. FennerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Schillinger v. Town of VeronaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. R. Connor Co. v. GoodwillieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Schraer v. StefanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API