Legal Opinion

Jolitz v. Fintch

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1938PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The action arose out of a collision on the highway of an automobile owned and driven by the plaintiff Wendt with one owned and driven by the defendant Fintch. The plaintiff Jolitz was a guest riding in Wendt’s car. Both Wendt and Jolitz were injured in the collision, and each sued Fintch and his insurer to recover for his injuries, alleging they were caused by negligence of Fintch. On the trial it was admitted that the injuries were so caused and that Wendt and Jolitz were free from negligence.

The only questions submitted to the jury were as to damages. The jury assessed the damages of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Heimlich v. TaborWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. McCoy v. TerhorstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Miller Saw-Trimmer Co. v. CheshireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. R. Connor Co. v. GoodwillieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Lehner v. Berlin Publishing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Zillmer v. MiglautschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. McCauley v. International Trading Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. City of Milwaukee v. BichelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Tombal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Flintrop v. LefcoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API