Ramey v. Knorr
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Cox, C.J.
— Insanity and other mental incapacities are not generally recognized as defenses to a claim of negligence.1 Some jurisdictions permit a limited exception to this rule by permitting sudden mental incapacity as a defense for a tortfeasor.2 This defense requires a defendant to establish “(1) [they had] no prior notice or forewarning of [their] potential for becoming disabled, and (2) the disability renders [them] incapable of conforming to the standards of ordinary care.”3 We hold that there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a jury to find that Nancy Knorr (Knorr) was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Alcoa v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ramey v. KnorrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Jaeger v. CLEAVER CONST., INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Jaeger v. Cleaver Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Harrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- In re McCannCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.