Legal Opinion

Ramey v. Knorr

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 17, 2005No. 55397-6-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Cox, C.J.

— Insanity and other mental incapacities are not generally recognized as defenses to a claim of negligence.1 Some jurisdictions permit a limited exception to this rule by permitting sudden mental incapacity as a defense for a tortfeasor.2 This defense requires a defendant to establish “(1) [they had] no prior notice or forewarning of [their] potential for becoming disabled, and (2) the disability renders [them] incapable of conforming to the standards of ordinary care.”3 We hold that there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a jury to find that Nancy Knorr (Knorr) was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Alcoa v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Aluminum Co. of America v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ramey v. KnorrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  2. Jaeger v. CLEAVER CONST., INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Jaeger v. Cleaver Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Harrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. In re McCannCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API