Legal Opinion

Ayers v. Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1992No. 57667-0PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

A 15-month-old child suffered irreparable brain damage after inhaling baby oil. The child's parents and guardian ad litem sued the manufacturer of the oil, Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Co., alleging that the injury was proximately caused by the manufacturer's negligence in failing to put a warning on the container. The jury returned a verdict for the child and his parents. The trial judge granted Johnson & Johnson a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or, alternatively, a new trial. The Court of Appeals reinstated the jury verdict. We affirm the Court of Appeals.

Facts

In the early evening…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Klem v. Washington Mutual BankWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Beal v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Beal for Martinez v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API