Ayers v. Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
A 15-month-old child suffered irreparable brain damage after inhaling baby oil. The child's parents and guardian ad litem sued the manufacturer of the oil, Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Co., alleging that the injury was proximately caused by the manufacturer's negligence in failing to put a warning on the container. The jury returned a verdict for the child and his parents. The trial judge granted Johnson & Johnson a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or, alternatively, a new trial. The Court of Appeals reinstated the jury verdict. We affirm the Court of Appeals.
Facts
In the early evening…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
- Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Klem v. Washington Mutual BankWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Beal v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Beal for Martinez v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.