Legal Opinion
Hernandez v. Temple
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 1983No. Civ. 65070PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DALSIMER, J.
Plaintiffs Josefina Hernandez, Esperanza Hernandez, and Elvira Hernandez appeal from the order of June 9,1981, granting the motion of defendants, Frank E. Temple and Federated Department Stores, for summary judgment. Judgment was entered after appellants filed their notice of appeal. *288Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 2(c), we deem the notice of appeal to be a timely notice of appeal from the judgment.
The complaint alleges that on September 18, 1976, while appellants were passengers in a vehicle driven by plaintiff Samuel Hernandez,1 respondents so negligently…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Tresemer v. BarkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Billings v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dieckmann v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Steele v. TotahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Hansen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Standard Microsystems Corp. v. Winbond Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Walker v. City of San ClementeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.