Legal Opinion
Steele v. Totah
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 1986No. A028009PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHITE, P. J.
Plaintiff and appellant Helen Steele appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco entered after the motion for summary judgment of defendants and respondents Raymond Totah and Angelo Mazza was granted. We affirm.
I
Helen Steele is 84 years old and currently resides in San Mateo County. Formerly, she was lessee of an apartment in San Francisco owned by respondents. She brought suit against respondents for breach of implied warranty of habitability, both in contract and tort; negligent violation of statutory duty; breach of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Martin v. KehlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Royster v. MontanezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Eben-King v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Howell v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- In Re Groundwater CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Vikco Insurance Services, Inc. v. Ohio Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.