Legal Opinion
Hangarter v. Paul Revere Life Insurance
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 12, 2002No. C 99-5286 JLPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR NEW TRIAL
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FINDING VIOLATION OF CAL. BUS. & PROF. CODE § 17200
LARSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or for a New Trial came on for hearing on June 5, 2002. Appearing for Plaintiff were Ray Bourhis, Alice Wolf-son, David Lilienstein, and Daniel U. Smith. Appearing for Defendants was Horace Greene and Evan Tager, who participated by telephone from Washington, D.C. After reviewing the parties’ extensive briefs and the record in this case and hearing…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Gilbrook v. City of WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Saldi v. Paul Revere Life Ins.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Merrick v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2008
- Worsham v. Provident Companies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2003
- Imperial Trading Co. v. Travelers Property Cas. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.