Worsham v. Provident Companies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STORY, District Judge.
Now before the Court for consideration are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [63-1], Plaintiffs Second Motion To Amend Complaint [72-1], and Defendants’ Motion for Leave To File Supplement to Reply Memorandum [76-1]. As a preliminary matter, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Leave To File Supplement to Reply Memorandum [76-1]. After reviewing the record and considering the parties’ arguments, the Court enters the following Order.
BACKGROUND
In 1985, Plaintiff purchased a disability income policy from Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Combs v. Plantation PatternsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bozeman v. Per-Se Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
- J'CARPC, LLC v. WilkinsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
- WESI, LLC v. Compass Environmental, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
- Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Amerik Supplies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
- Blosser v. Boggus (In re Boggus)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.