Legal Opinion

Lompoc Valley Bank v. Stephenson

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1909No. L.A. No. 2390PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

June 10, 1905, the plaintiff loaned to one Hobson the full sum of twenty-eight hundred dollars, for which he executed his promissory note payable September 1, 1906. At the same time and place that the loan was made, and before the delivery of the note to plaintiff, the defendants signed the following guaranty indorsed thereon: “The payment of the within note and interest is hereby guaranteed. Dated June 10th 1905.” Part only of the loan has been repaid, and this is an action in the usual form against the guarantors to recover the unpaid balance. In defense of the action the defendants pleaded…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reynolds Irr. Dist. v. SproatIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Seth v. Lew HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Oakland Medical Building Corp. v. AureguyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Carver v. San Joaquin Cigar Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API