Legal Opinion
Southington Savings Bank v. Rodgers
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 26, 1995No. 13802PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLayery, J.
The plaintiff, Southington Savings Bank, appeals from the judgment of the trial court declaring a security interest null and void, and awarding the defendants punitive damages and attorney’s fees. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) found the plaintiff liable under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., despite a defectively pleaded counterclaim; (2) granted the equitable remedy of rescission of the mortgage; (3) awarded punitive damages; (4) found that the plaintiffs conduct amounted to a deceptive act in violation of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Jacobs v. Healey Ford-Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Caldor, Inc. v. HeslinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Francisco Elizarraras v. Bank of El PasoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Richards v. Direct Energy Servs., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Miller v. GuimaraesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Johnson Electric Co. v. Salce Contracting Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Bentley v. Greensky Trade Credit, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.