Legal Opinion

Texarkana Special School District v. Ritchie Grocer Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 18, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellant insists that the order erroneously refunding the taxes to appellee was void as having been made by the county judge and not the court, and that the demurrer admits the allegations of the complaint showing such fact, and that the court therefore erred in sustaining the demurrer.

It is true the complaint alleges that the order was made on a certain day, “which was neither an adjourned nor regular term of the county court of Miller County, Arkansas, the county judge, pretending to be sitting as a court, made a void order and judgment, etc.” to refund…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pierce Oil Corp. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Pierce Oil Corp. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. Brown v. Arkansas Central Power Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. House v. Road Improvement District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Moore v. North College Avenue Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Seubold v. Fort Smith Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  2. Geyer v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  3. Wilburn v. MoonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  4. Smyrna Baptist Church v. BurbridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  5. Dillinger v. PickensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API