Seubold v. Fort Smith Special School District
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. MoFaddin, Justice.
The appellants are attacking the requirement, that school children be vaccinated against smallpox.
Mr. and Mrs. Frank Seubold, residents of Fort Smith, have three children, Ruth, Frank, and T. K., who are 13, 10 and 8 years of age respectively. The parents, for themselves and the minors, filed suit in the Chancery Court against the Fort Smith School District and its School Superintendent, alleging, inter alia:
i ‘ That the said Ruth Ann Seubold, Frank N. Seubold, and T. K. Seubold are all of good moral habits, are free from infectious disease, and are not suffering from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Zucht v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Pierce Oil Corp. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Herndon v. GregorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Files v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Cude v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Hartsock v. Forsgren, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Rich v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- Grable v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.