Legal Opinion

Woolley v. Tougas

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided August 1, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, C. J.

These two cases involve the same parties and issues and are based' upon the same facts. The first is an action in assumpsit brought by the transferees of a mortgage upon real property, after a foreclosure sale thereunder, to recover the amount of a deficiency due upon the mortgage note executed by the mortgagor. The second is a bill in equity brought by that mortgagor to restrain the transferees of his mortgage from further proceeding in that action at law, and also to set aside the foreclosure sale for alleged fraud and unfairness therein. The first action is before us on the defendant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Federal Title, C., Guaranty Co. v. LowensteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  2. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. PasternackNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
  3. Busey v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  4. Harvey v. Provident Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  5. Lurie v. J.J. Hockenjos Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nevada Land & Mortgage Co. v. Hidden Wells Ranch, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1967
  2. LaPorte v. Ramac Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  3. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  4. Richard H. Boucher v. Kevin E. SweetSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  5. Cedrone v. Warwick Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API