J. J. Hockenjos Co. v. Lurie
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
IIaetshokni!, S. C. C.
On this suit for deficiency on a mortgage bond, plaintiff moves to strike a series of defenses interposed, on the ground that same are res adjudicata, by reason of previous litigation between the parties, hereinafter set forth and also because of insufficiency in point of law. Of its separate defenses, the defendant has abandoned his first, second and fourth. The remainder are substantially that (1) plaintiff’s announcements on the foreclosure sale were misleading and depreciated the sale price; (2) that plaintiff razed the buildings on the lands and thus prevented…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lurie v. J. J. Hockenjos Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Lurie v. J.J. Hockenjos Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Gore v. JennessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841
- Wolf v. SchlichtingNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
- Metropolitan Lumber Co. v. Fordham National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robinson-Shore Development Co. v. GallagherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Dean v. Barrett Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Dean v. Barrett Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- State Ex Rel. JaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- State ex rel. J.A.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008