State v. Breeden
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEYER, Justice.
Defendant assigns as error, inter alia, the trial court’s denial of his motion in limine to exclude evidence of other charges or investigation involving offenses other than these on trial and allowing testimony relating to offenses for which he was not on trial. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that the court’s rulings with respect to this motion were erroneous and that defendant is entitled to a new trial.
Pertinent to our discussion are the following facts: On the morning of 15 August 1980, two men entered Horne’s Grocery and Package Store on Person Street in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. FeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. WeldonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. CheekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.