State v. Johnson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
The questions presented in this appeal are whether the trial court erred in (1) admitting evidence of crimes other than those being tried; (2) denying defendant’s motion to excuse a juror for cause; (3) its instructions on the meaning of “vaginal intercourse”; and (4) refusing to instruct on the lesser included offense of attempted first degree rape. We find reversible error only in Judge Ferrell’s failing to instruct the jury on attempted first degree rape as to one of the victims. Accordingly, we grant defendant a new trial on the charge of first degree rape as to this victim.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. Al-BayyinahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.