State v. Glidden
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Upon conviction appellant Stephanie Ann Glidden’s demand for a new trial was granted on grounds other than those argued by appellant. See State v. Glidden, 451 N.W.2d 331 (Minn.App.1990). The supreme court reversed and remanded the case to this court for consideration of the issues raised on appeal. See State v. Glidden, 455 N.W.2d 744 (Minn.1990). We affirm.
FACTS
The facts of this case have been set out in the prior opinions of both this court and the supreme court. See State v. Glidden, 451 N.W.2d 331, 331-33 (Minn.App.1990), rev’d 455 N.W.2d 744, 746 (Minn.1990).
ISSUES
1…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. NoelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997