Legal Opinion
State v. Glidden
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 13, 1990No. C8-89-1019Published
1Opinion of the Court
451 N.W.2d 331 (1990)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Stephanie Ann GLIDDEN, Appellant.
No. C8-89-1019.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
February 13, 1990.
Review Granted April 13, 1990.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Robert M.A. Johnson, Anoka County Atty., M. Katherine Doty, James J. Weber, Jr., Asst. County Attys., Anoka, for respondent.
Corey J. Ayling, O'Connor & Hannan, Minneapolis, for appellant.
Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., HUSPENI and STONE, JJ.[*]
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant Stephanie Ann Glidden was convicted of theft of property with an aggregate value…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cabana v. BullockSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. MalaskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.