Legal Opinion
United States v. Kohler Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 28, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 8947PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.
This is a civil action brought by the United States, based upon the anti-trust laws. The gist of the complaint is that the defendant, a manufacturer of vitreous china and enamel plumbing fixtures and sanitary brass fittings, has restrained commerce by requiring dealers and others purchasing fixtures from it to buy its fittings as well. The prayer is for injunctive relief only.
The defendant has filed interrogatories and supplemental interrogatories, 22 in all. The plaintiff has answered all but three, to which it has filed objections (S, 16 and part of 22). The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Arnstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
- De Bruce v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- O'NEILL v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
3Cited by32 opinions
- Sierra Berdecía v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Boeing Airplane Company v. Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board, Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board v. Boeing Airplane Company, Boeing Airplane Company, Cross-Appellant v. Thomas Coggeshall, Chairman, the Renegotiation Board, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Boeing Airplane Co. v. CoggeshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- James F. Bell v. Swift & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.