Legal Opinion
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 15, 1958No. 102-54PublishedCited by 205 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REED, Justice (Retired),
sitting by designation.
Plaintiff, Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, formerly named The Permanente Metals Corporation, filed a petition pending motion for call, pur suant to Rule 13 of this court, 28 U.S. C.A. The pertinent part of the Rule is set out below. 1 This petition was accompanied by a Motion for Call in accord with 28 U.S.C. (Supp. Ill, 1952 ed.) § 2507 and this court’s Rule 27. 2 Before action was taken on the motion an amended and amplified petition was filed, and at the same time a motion for withdrawal of the call without prejudice. This was allowed.
T…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by205 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- William Jordan v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.