Legal Opinion

Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. Nields

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 15, 1934No. 5499PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

On March 7, 1932, the petitioner, an Illinois corporation, filed a bill in the District Court for the District of Delaware against Motor Improvements, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Ernest J. Sweetland, a citizen and resident of California. The bill alleged a cause of action for interfering patents under Rev. St. § 4918 (35 USCA § 66), and prayed for injunction against, and damages for, the infringement of a patent. Sweet-land entered a special appearance and moved to dismiss. On November 21, 1932, the District Court dismissed the bill as to Sweetland for lack of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maryland v. Soper, JudgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Ex Parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. American Construction Co. v. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Los Angeles Brush Manufacturing Corp. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. Motor Improvements, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whittel v. RocheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  2. Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1939
  3. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API