Legal Opinion

Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly & Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 17, 1991No. C 90 0373 DLJPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JENSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On April 10, 1991, this Court heard oral argument on the following motions: plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint; defendant’s motion to amend the original answer, add affirmative defenses and counterclaims, and for an extension of time for discovery; defendant’s motion to compel joinder of a necessary party; and lastly, plaintiff’s motion for appointment of a special master.

This order addresses only the defendant’s motion to add an interference counterclaim, defendant’s motion for joinder of a necessary party and plaintiff's motion for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mallinckrodt Medical, Inc. v. Sonus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  2. In Re the Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API