Regents of the University of California v. Eli Lilly & Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JENSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On April 10, 1991, this Court heard oral argument on the following motions: plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint; defendant’s motion to amend the original answer, add affirmative defenses and counterclaims, and for an extension of time for discovery; defendant’s motion to compel joinder of a necessary party; and lastly, plaintiff’s motion for appointment of a special master.
This order addresses only the defendant’s motion to add an interference counterclaim, defendant’s motion for joinder of a necessary party and plaintiff's motion for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mallinckrodt Medical, Inc. v. Sonus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- In Re the Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992