Legal Opinion
Contex, Inc. v. Consolidated Technologies, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 27, 1988No. C-860407PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShannon, J.
Defendants-appellants Consolidated Technologies, Inc. (“Consolidated Technologies”), Nathaniel J. Kuller and Craig S. Merton have taken the instant appeal from the judgment entered by the court below upon its finding the appellants in contempt of an injunction restricting their solicitation of business under the name “Consolidated Technologies, Inc.” On appeal, the appellants contest the standard of proof applied and the balance struck by the court below in weighing the evidence adduced at the hearing on the motion for contempt.
In August 1985, plaintiff-appellee ConTex, Inc. (“ConTex”), a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Latrobe Steel Co. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Brown v. Executive 200, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
- Lamb v. CramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Arthur Young & Co. v. KellyOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Citicasters Co. v. Stop 26-Riverbend, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- In re Contemnor Caron, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2000
- City of Moraine v. Steger Motors, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
- ITS Fin., L.L.C. v. GebreOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.