Legal Opinion
Arthur Young & Co. v. Kelly
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 28, 1990No. Case 89AP-711PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReilly, P.J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas finding defendant, David Kelly, in contempt for violating a preliminary injunction. The merits of the preliminary injunction were previously reviewed by this court in Arthur Young & Company v. Kelly (Apr. 28, 1988), No. 87AP-800, unreported (1988 Opinions 1531).
Plaintiff is a large national accounting firm. Defendant was employed as an accountant at plaintiffs Columbus office. Defendant joined the firm in 1984 and eventually was promoted to principal status within the firm. On May 21,1987, the firm informed…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Vanguard Transportation Systems, Inc. v. Edwards Transfer & Storage Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re the Marriage of SeylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Citicasters Co. v. Stop 26-Riverbend, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- First Bank of Marietta v. MascreteOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Arthur Young & Co. v. KellyOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.