Legal Opinion

Citicasters Co. v. Stop 26-Riverbend, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 2002No. Case Nos. 00 C.A. 149, 00 C.A. 212PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gene Donofrio, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Stop 26-Riverbend, Inc. (“Stop 26”), Esq. Communications, Inc. (“ESQ”), and attorney Percy Squire (“Squire”), appeal a decision of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court finding them in contempt of court.

{¶ 2} The relationship between the parties here dates back to at least May 20, 1998 when plaintiff-appellee, Citicasters Co. 1 (“Citicasters”), and Stop 26 entered into an Assets Purchase Agreement (“APA”) whereby Stop 26 agreed to sell to Citicasters certain assets associated with the ownership and operation of a radio station now known as…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In re Jane Doe 1Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Latrobe Steel Co. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Arcadia Acres v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Royal Investment Group, LLC v. WangCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Smith v. BradshawOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Columbus v. AMC Vision, V, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Scarnecchia v. Rebhan, Unpublished Decision (12-14-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API