Legal Opinion

Pshigoda v. Texaco, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided January 29, 1986No. 07-84-0229-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUNTISS, Justice.

This is a suit to cancel an oil and gas lease. The mineral owners and appellants, the Pshigoda family, sued the leaseholder and appellee, Texaco, Inc., contending Texaco was holding the lease by two oil wells that were not producing in paying quantities. Appealing from a take-nothing judgment rendered after the jury failed to find facts essential to their recovery, the Pshi-godas advance four points of error that present two determinative issues: 1 (1) did the trial court err by telling the jury to exclude reworking costs when determining operating and marketing costs, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clifton v. KoontzTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Garcia v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Skelly Oil Company v. ArcherTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Ladd Petroleum Corp. v. Eagle Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Morgan v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Abraxas Petroleum Corp. v. Hornburg, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2000
  2. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Pool, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  3. Paulus v. Beck Energy Corp., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Monroe County2017
  4. Peacock v. Schroeder, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
  5. Roemer Oil Co. v. Aztec Gas & Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API